MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153980984 · doi:10.1049/pbtr052e_ch4

Turbulence in transport

2025· book-chapter· en· W7153980984 on OpenAlexaff
Constantinos S. Kandias, Ronald Hanson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceEddyAerodynamicsFlow (mathematics)K-epsilon turbulence modelRange (aeronautics)Fluid dynamicsTurbulence modelingObstacle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbulence is a ubiquitous feature of fluid dynamics, with implications across a wide range of scientific and engineering disciplines. While general studies have provided valuable insight into the physics that govern fluid motion, focused analyses of particular turbulent flow phenomena yield results directly applicable to specific contexts. In ground transportation, whether for a compact car or a semi-trailer truck, aerodynamic forces and moments increase with speed and are strongly influenced by turbulence in the surrounding air. Small-scale eddies can alter boundary-layer development and flow separation, whereas large-scale structures can impose quasi-steady variations in the incident flow, both of which have significant consequences for vehicle performance, efficiency, and stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207