MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154016158 · doi:10.71067/aepvii-2022-273-310

Rhodiola Rosea L. (roseroot) its Cultural history and pharmacological effects

2022· book-chapter· en· W7154016158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizomeRhodiola roseaSalidrosideRhodiolaPerennial plantFolk medicineCrassulaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae), is a perennial plant native to Europe and Asia, growing typically on the plateaus or stony slopes of the mountains above the Arctic Circle. The plant with yellow flowers and succulent leaves has a brown-red rhizome and root system that has an intense rose scent. This rhizome contains biologically active compounds with different chemical characteristics. Its first written record dates back to 77 BC. The Greek physician Dioscorides described the use of “rhodia radix” as a medicine in his De Materia Medica. Traditional medicine used it to increase general fitness and endurance, to overcome insomnia, depression, anaemia, impotence, gastro-intestinal disorders, inflammation, central nervous system problems, headaches, and colds. Its adaptogenic activity has been known for centuries, but it was only at the end of the 20 th century that its antioxidant effect was confirmed in animal and human clinical experiments by identifying the molecular groups responsible for the effect: the rhizome of the roseroot contains phenylpropanoid molecules (rosin, rosarin, salidroside and rosavin components). In order to meet the world’s increased demand for plant material,instead of exterminating the wild growing stock, it was necessary to solve the problem of cultivating the plant in controlled conditions. This problem was solved by several teams worldwide, e.g. in Mikkeli, Finland. Nowadays the Rhodiola rosea rhizome is grown under commercial cultivation from the Urals to Alaska, including areas like Canada, the Norwegian, Danish, and Austrian Alps. During the investigation of the plant chemistry of the rhizomes grown in Mikkeli, Finland we found that depending on the place of origin, the total rosavin content varies from 4.6 mg/g to 8.2 mg/g, the bitter value 5000 to 15000, and determined the two main components of their essential oil, myrtenol (14-35%) and geraniol (18-62%) ratio. Rhizomes of Finnish and Komi origin contain also 5-8% campesterol and 25-35% sitosterol phytosterol components, which shows the good quality of the species and explains why its fragrance is similar to that of the rose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207