Practice 2 Decolonization: Centring Indigenization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Practice 2 Decolonization Melissa invites readers into a learning and unlearning circle to open and hold space for all as both teachers and learners. The authors acknowledge that helping professions have offered, and continue to offer, a limited view of health and healing based most often on dominating, eurowestern worldviews. They reflect on the ways coloniality is threaded through the current theory and practice of counselling and psychology. They then paint a picture of what it might look like to apply the principle of decolonization to the theory and practice of counselling and psychology, inviting consideration of how our individual and collective vision of health and healing may be defined (i.e., what possibilities are included) and confined (i.e., what possibilities are excluded) based on our worldviews. The authors define decolonization as a commitment to upholding reciprocity, respect, and care for all our relations (humans, animals, the land, and ecosystems). Decolonization calls for an unlearning of the practices of colonization. The call for reconciliation is an invitation into proper and healthy relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples based on mutuality, respect for dignity, and inclusivity. By centring and uplifting Indigenous worldviews, the authors aim to enhance cultural safety and care within the professions of counselling and psychotherapy. Indigenizing, in this sense, is about centring Indigenous-led, supported, culturally relevant, and responsive practice for Indigenous clients. The authors link decolonial practice to the “Calls to Action” of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Sandra and Melissa are honoured to profile the contributions of the following co-authors: ● Randy White welcomes readers into the learning space through drumming (video), which is an integral element of his own healing practices that connects him, and those he walks alongside, to Spirit. ● Gwendolyn Villebrun offers guidance to counsellors in responding to the National Inquiry on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. She draws on the “Calls for Justice” to ensure trauma-informed, well-funded, and Indigenous-led services, centring wellness in ways that respect Indigenous practices and knowledge systems. ● Jamie Consoli speaks to Indigenizing through connection (in video conversation with Melissa). She invites a focus on our relationships to connect with ourselves. By connecting with each other in community, where we are all equals, we learn from one another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".