MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7154443645

Intersexual Comparison of Plasma Osmolytes, Kidney Size, and Glomerular Number and Size in Pekin Ducks (arias Platyrhynchos)

2024· article· W7154443645 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maryanne R. Hughes, Eldon J. Braun, Darin C. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsKidneyPlasma renin activityRenal functionRenin–angiotensin system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased sodium chloride (NaC1) intake resulted in sexually disparate changes in body mass and plasma osmolality (Osmp•; Hughes et al. 1992) and plasma concentrations of the osmoregulatory hormones arginine vasotocin ([AVT]p 0 and angiotensin II ([AII]p•; Zenteno-Savin 1991) in Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos).During gradual increase in drinking water NaC1 concentration ([NaC1]), both sexes maintained body mass and changed Osmp•, [AVT]p•, and [AII]p• similarly until they drank 300 mM NaC1; at higher [NaC1], males became more dehydrated and their Osm•, [AVT] p•, and [AII]• increased significantly more than in females.Kidney mass tended to be smaller in male ducks than in female ducks (Hughes et al. 1989(Hughes et al. , 1992)).In this study, we reexamined body mass, hematocrit (Hct), plasma ion concentrations, and Osmp• of male and female Pekin ducks rapidly acclimated (over three weeks) to 225 mM NaC1 and following longer exposure to this [NaC1] (four and seven months).Finally, the ducks were euthanized and dissected to obtain organ masses.We found female ducks had larger kidneys, so we counted glomeruli (nephrons) in kidneys of both sexes to determine if the kidneys of females actually contained more nephrons.We also measured glomerular diameters to determine if glomerular sizes were equally represented in both sexes.Methods and materials.--TwelvePekin ducks (6 male, 6 female) were reared for six months in adjacent enclosures on ad libitum tap water and duck pellets (Buckerfield's, Abbottsford, British Columbia; sodium, [Na-•], potassium, [K-•], and chloride, [C1-], concentrations, 83, 153.5, and 99 mM.Kg -•, respectively).They were then acclimated in three equal weekly increments to 225 mM NaC1.Drinking this solution at the minimum rate measured for Pekin ducks (Hughes et al. 1991) should replace at least one-half of the Na* in the extracellular fluid each day.This Na -• intake should have been sufficient to increase the secretory potential of the salt glands allowing Osmp• to be maintained (Hughes et aL 1992).At the end of each week, birds were weighed and 5.0 mL blood samples were taken.The birds were held on 225 mM NaC1 for seven months and blood samples were taken at the end of the fourth and seventh months.Triplicate Strumia microhematocrit tubes were immediately filled from each blood sample and centrifuged simultaneously with the remaining blood for 3 min at 15,600 x g.After the last blood sampling, four female and three male ducks were intravenously infused with Alcian blue for 30 min to stain the glomeruli (Bankir and Hollenberg 1983) and then euthanized with a lethal dose of sodium pentobarbitol.The heart, liver, kidneys, and salt, adrenal, and Harderjan glands were removed and weighed with a Mettier top-loading balance with an accuracy of 1 mg.Experiments conformed to guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.All analyses were done at least in duplicate.De-782 Short Communications and Commentaries [Auk, Vol.112 lustrated by their diet during spring migration.Ornis Scan& 9:178-192.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)→Same topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species→French-language works237,207→