MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Adaptive Control for Smart Greenhouse Integrated Microgrid

2025· article· W7154461807 on OpenAlexafffund
Tuan Minh Tran, Ahmed Ouammi, Louis-A Dessaint

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrogridAdaptive controlReinforcement learningControl (management)GreenhouseControl systemControl theory (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) framework for adaptive control of a smart greenhouse integrated into a renewable-based microgrid. The system jointly regulates temperature, humidity, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\text{CO}_{2}$</tex> concentration, lighting, water pumping, and battery storage to reduce the electric grid dependence. To enhance training efficiency, the actor networks of Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) agents are pretrained using imitation learning on datasets generated from nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). Simulation results across multiple tomato growth stages show that MADRL achieves performance comparable to NMPC in microclimate and energy regulation while operating almost an order of magnitude faster in online computation. Moreover, under uncertain weather forecasts with noise and bias, MADRL outperforms NMPC in both tracking accuracy and energy efficiency, demonstrating strong robustness to forecast errors and adaptability to uncertainty. These findings highlight the potential of MADRL as a computationally efficient and resilient alternative for greenhouse-microgrid operation, paving the way for real-time applications and future extensions to profit-driven, year-round control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207