Iniciativas para promover la intención emprendedora de los estudiantes universitarios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo propone varias recomendaciones para fomentar la intención emprendedora entre estudiantes universitarios en América Latina. Las recomendaciones se basan en análisis secundarios de dos estudios en los cuales se encuestaron a 1.213 estudiantes de pregrado, matriculados en programas relacionados con negocios en cinco universidades de Colombia, Ecuador, México y Perú. El primer estudio examinó la influencia de la educación en emprendimiento sobre la intención emprendedora, mientras que el segundo analizó cómo los role models (personas referentes) y el apoyo emprendedor afectan de manera diferenciada la intención emprendedora de mujeres y hombres. A partir de estos hallazgos, se presentan varias recomendaciones de gestión y de política para universidades y otros actores relevantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".