MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI-Driven Real-Time Synchronization (ASC-6): Optimizing Logistics Resilience and Financial Performance

2025· article· W7154501696 on OpenAlexaff
Lahcen Kandsi, Arif Jabir, Fouad Jawab

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Synchronization (alternating current)Key (lock)Vulnerability (computing)Financial crisisSupply chain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of Supply Chain 4.0--named after an adjectival portrayal of technologies like IoT, AI and DLT that adds up to a “4.0”-the days when logistics was about sequential batch processing are over, replaced by new real-time event driven networks moving in its place. In an age where the name of the game is real-time distribution, this paper will address the essential difficulties of systems engineering in complex cyber-physical environments, and specifically talk about a big hole: no full set frame system to make end-to-end real-time synchronization possible across vital shipping interfaces (Warehouse Management Systems (WMS), Transportation Management Systems TMS).) and hardware. To this end, we present the Architecture for Synchronization in Six Layers (ASC-6), which is a new and secure framework that forms a blueprint for high-fidelity logistics operations. ASC-6 coordinates and directs the data through a series of: •Acquisition (IoT/CDC): Persistent telemetry by IoT and CDC from core systems. •Communications (MQTT/Edge) Low latency data transfer with MQTT-based edge connection. •Harmonization (Kafka): Data harmonising across organisations, resulting in Unified Data Model for Semantic coherence among various partners. •Predictive Intelligence (LSTM): Using LSTM Neural Network for predicting supply chain deviations and scoring prescriptive actions. •(Event-Driven Orchestration (BRM): Automatically trigger remediation through a Business Rule Engine (BRM) for immediate operational response. •Governance (Blockchain) Write all sync events DLT for transparency, immutability and decentralized trust. The method involves a bibliometric analysis of 500 peer-reviewed papers (2000-2025) to validate the architectural design by identifying deficiencies in existing research regarding integrated frameworks.) Shortly, we will present a digital twin architecture able to calibrate and validate the ASC-6 based on an Agent-Based Model (ABM) in order to test it under different breaking disruption scenarios. The simulation results show that the prescriptive capability of ASC-6 dramatically decreased DL by 45 % on average (from minutes to milliseconds) compared with classical systems. The framework also results in a 69 % recovery improvement in$R T$after a major disruption, which causes significant measurable reduction of CNS. Such system design, integration and validation is a crucial cornerstone for realizing resilient, proactive and genuinely agile global networks the researchers and practitioners in Advanced Technologies for Supply Chain Management (ATSCM) are hoping to create.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207