Leveraging Machine Learning for Acoustic Feature Analysis in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Insights into Emotional Profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in preschoolers often involve social and communication deficits, contributing to heightened anger, sadness, and anxiety. This study examined whether acoustic features of speech could detect emotional dysregulation in 65 French-speaking children (age 4) diagnosed with ADHD, developmental language disorder, psychosocial issues, or cognitive impairments. Using standardized assessments, participants were grouped by emotional/psychological, speech/language, or cognitive/motor difficulties. Audio recordings from structured and unstructured tasks were processed via openSMILE, generating 153 features capturing spectral, prosodic, and energy parameters linked to emotion. A random forest classifier compared these acoustic profiles to EmoDB samples labeled with negative emotions. Results showed that children with NDDs exhibited unique acoustic markers of negative emotions, though differences among subgroups were minimal. Attempts to pinpoint anxiety as a diagnostic feature were inconclusive. Overall, machine learning–based acoustic analysis holds promise for identifying emotional dysregulation, encouraging further multimodal approaches in clinical assessments, and more robust early interventions overall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".