MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154589434 · doi:10.48448/3xmt-r657

Metacognition as a domain of skill

2025· other· W7154589434 on OpenAlexaff
Cognitive Science Society 2025, Brendan Conway-Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetacognitionDomain (mathematical analysis)CognitionKey (lock)Empirical researchProcedural knowledgeDreyfus model of skill acquisitionEmpirical evidence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a framework for understanding metacognition as a distinct domain of skill, drawing on established research in motor and cognitive domains. It proposes that metacognitive expertise shares key characteristics with other skill domains, including goal-directed action, hierarchical organization, declarative and procedural knowledge, and automatization. By integrating theoretical and empirical insights, this paper aims to establish a comprehensive model of metacognitive skill development, with implications for research and practical applications in education, therapy, and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.French-language works237,207