Smart Traffic Monitoring System for Urban Safety through IoT-Enabled Machine Learning Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic congestion and road accidents are major challenges in urban areas due to rapid urbanization and increasing vehicle population. Traditional traffic monitoring systems are not efficient in handling real-time traffic conditions and ensuring urban safety. This research proposes a Smart Traffic Monitoring System for Urban Safety through an IoT-Enabled Machine Learning Framework. The proposed system uses IoT sensors, surveillance cameras, and wireless communication technologies to collect real-time traffic data such as vehicle count, speed, traffic density, and accident information. The collected data is transmitted to a cloud server where machine learning algorithms are used to analyze traffic data, predict traffic congestion, and detect accidents. The system also generates real-time alerts to traffic authorities and emergency services in case of accidents and traffic violations. The proposed system integrates IoT, machine learning, cloud computing, and real-time monitoring technologies to improve traffic management and urban safety. The performance of the proposed system is evaluated using machine learning algorithms such as Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Convolutional Neural Network. The results show that the proposed system achieves high accuracy in traffic prediction and accident detection and improves traffic flow, reduces accident risk, and enhances emergency response time. The proposed Smart Traffic Monitoring System provides an efficient and intelligent solution for smart city traffic management and urban safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".