Proposal for a Tidal Barrage Power Plant on the Sandwip Channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A greater need for energy is inevitable in a world with a growing population and expanding range of human pursuits. Coal accounts for around 40 % of the energy used in the power generation process. The widespread concern about the effects of climate change is largely attributable to the fact that fuels and hydrocarbons are being used for energy. As a result, there is a growing need for renewable energy options. The potential for harnessing tidal energy to generate large amount of power has been shown by several studies. Sandwip channel is Bangladesh's best bet because of its large sea surface area and high tidal range. This paper thus investigated the possibilities of constructing a tidal barrage system power plant on Sandwip Channel. Accordingly, the goal of this research is to estimate the probable cost for a tidal barrage system, taking into consideration the system's yield and price. The cost of per unit energy from the proposed tidal barrage system is found to be BDT (৳) 5.63 which is lower than the present cost of per unit energy ৳ 7.49, for the existing power plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".