Performance of Primocane-Fruiting Raspberries Grownin the Greenhouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seven cultivars of primocane-fruiting raspberries ( Rubus idaeusL.) were grown for three years in a greenhouse in Simcoe, Ontario. Red raspberry cultivars ‘Autumn Bliss,’ ‘Autumn Britten,’ ‘Caroline,’ ‘Heritage,’ ‘Polana,’ and ‘Summit,’ and the yellow raspberry, ‘Anne,’ were compared for berry yield, fruit quality, and earliness and consistency of fruiting. Two types of propagules of ‘Autumn Britten’ were used, tissue-cultured and vegetative, and these behaved similarly with the exception of fruiting consistency in the first harvest season. ‘Polana’ yielded the most, ‘Autumn Britten’ produced the largest berries, and ‘Summit’ and ‘Heritage’ ranked highest for total fruit quality. Early and consistent fruiting patterns were exhibited by ‘Polana,’ ‘Autumn Britten’ and ‘Summit.’
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".