MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of Focal control of non-invasive deep brain stimulation using multipolar temporal interference

2025· article· W7154915997 on OpenAlexaff
Boris Botzanowski, Emma Acerbo, Sebastian Lehmann, Sarah L. Kearsley, Melanie Steiner, Esra Neufeld, Florian Missey, Lyle Muller, Viktor Jirsa, Brian D. Corneil, Adam Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccadeInterference (communication)Phase (matter)Deep brain stimulationOffset (computer science)MicrostimulationSIGNAL (programming language)Envelope (radar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementary Material 1. Supplementary Figure 1. Phase interactions in mTI.Two envelopes, in phase, create a larger aggregate envelope.Two envelopes, with offset phase, create an poorly defined aggregate envelope.Two envelopes, with 180 degree phase offset, create no aggregate envelope. It is important to ensure phase alignment at the deep brain target. In this study, we ensured phase alignment as the aggregate envelope signal could be visually confirmed to be in phase using the recording electrode at the brain target. In future work, if no recording electrode is present at the target, a strategy to apply stimulation which provides in phase envelopes at the deep brain target is needed. Supplementary Figure 2: Example of functionally-related neural activity recorded from the SC Spiking activity of the unit shown in Fig. 4A of the main manuscript, focusing here on the activity following visual target onset. Top left panel shows eye movement trajectories for three 12 deg saccade vectors directed contralateral to the side of SC recording, with the color scheme denoting different vertical components. Middle to bottom left panels show, using the same color scheme, the horizontal eye position traces, the rasters of neural activity recorded from a channel in the intermediate layers of the SC, highlighted in red in the middle column, and the associated spike density functions. Middle column shows spike density functions for those channels positioned within the intermediate layers of the SC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8810.244

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207