MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154937988 · doi:10.15330/hal_swc.4.27-63

DRAGON FROM THE USPENSKY CHURCH IN HALYCH FROM THE POLISH RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE

2019· article· W7154937988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aneta Gołębiowska-Tobiasz, Dariusz Dąbrowski

Bibliographic record

VenueГалич Збірник наукових праць · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPejorativeStyle (visual arts)Quarter (Canadian coin)ArchitectureMotif (music)Perspective (graphical)Middle Ages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An interesting monument of medieval masonry is a bas-relief showing a fire-breathing dragon, which is curerntly located in the Uspensky church in Krylos. The style of the creature’s presentation is convergent, among others, with several Romanesque monuments in sculptural art from Poland. The motif of this mythical creature has been used in artistic composition since the dawn of time. The symbolism of the dragon contained both positive and pejorative potential, depending on the time and cultural circle in which it appeared. The authors, based on a comparative analysis of the style of the object, historical sources, epigraphic monuments and preserved forms and decorations of architectural details from the non-existent Cathedral of the Mother of God in Halych, propose to date the image of the dragon to the third quarter of the 12th century. This is also an example of one of the few monuments that show the Western European, Romanesque sculptural tradition in Eastern Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueГалич Збірник наукових працьSame topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207