MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155051917 · doi:10.59236/ijea15si1.6

Elliot Eisner

2014· article· W7155051917 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kit Grauer

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of education and the arts · 2014
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsMusic educationSupervisorLegislationVisual arts educationClass (philosophy)Fine art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 1970’s there was money in Education in British Columbia. New legislation brought in class size limitations and hundreds of new teachers were hired. School districts opened Supervisor of Instruction jobs in the Arts and I was lucky enough to have just finished my first Masters and found myself the Visual Art Supervisor for a Vancouver area school district. With the new positions came new advocacy organizations and we initiated the Arts in Education Advisory board and the BC Arts Administrators group. The Music Supervisor in Vancouver had just returned from a music conference in the United States and he was raving about this great keynote speaker from Stanford University- Elliot Eisner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of education and the artsSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207