"In the eddies of your passing" : transcorporeal experience in the poetry of Christopher Dewdney and Rebecca Elson
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attesting to the posthumanist concern for multiplicity, inclusiveness and interdependence, transcorporeality (Alaimo 2010) represents a particularly useful concept for interpreting modern poetry. By recognising the inseparability of the human and the "more-than-human" as well as the permeability of human bodies, transcorporeality echoes the fundamentally metaphorical nature of poetic perception and its "de-centring" expressive mechanisms. Drawing on these ideas, in this article I propose a discussion of a selection of texts by Canadian poets Christopher Dewdney and Rebecca Elson that are exemplary of a unique perspective resulting from the artful fusion of a solid positivist-scientific understanding of the universe and a fine artistic sensitivity intent on revealing the spiritual potential of the material. In particular, I am interested in highlighting how the awareness of the body's connections with its environment is conducive to the realignment of the individual with the biological and geological realms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".