MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155549195 · doi:10.3917/inno.034.0205d

André Lacroix , Critique de la raison économiste. L’économie n’est pas une science morale , Québec, Liber, 2009, 181 p.

2011· article· fr· W7155549195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovations · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDutyCriticismArgument (complex analysis)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméPour l’avenir à bâtir, les questions actuelles sont : une vie économique adaptée ou transformée ? Par quelle voie : la prescription juridique ou l’émergence réelle ? Dans l’empirisme ou la cohérence rassembleuse ? Face au marché : la régulation, ou le changement pour l’équité, fondement nécessaire des solidarités ? Au travail : un salariat consolidé ou une autogestion véritable, équitable et efficiente, et une régulation démocratique ? Entre populations, une mondialisation marchande acceptée ou une équité nouvelle ? Tels sont les thèmes introductifs, ici abordés, des propositions de l’ouvrage présenté par l’auteur.Codes JEL : A13, B14, B51, D45, D63, D71, E22, J54, L31, P13

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovationsSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207