A facil synthesis of CuO-CdO nanosheets by co-precipitation method and its effective photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine-B through visible light, pp. 248-253
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present investigation we proposed the growth of CuO-CdO composite is prepared by co-precipitation method.The CuO-CdO found to exhibit mixture of monoclinic and cubic structure along with CuO (-111) drirection and their crystallite size around 45nm were confirmed by XRD.SEM analysis represents the observation of hexagonal shape in addition with nanopores of CuO-CdO sheets.The absorption spectra of CuO-CdO exhibit broad visible regions resulting indirect bandgap with 1.4eV.Photoluminescence strong emision peaks at 361, 409, 521 and 594nm indicating band edge emission, surface trap, oxygen vacancy, radiative combination, respectively.The photocatalytic rhodamine-B decolorization efficiency of CuO-CdO exhibits 71% with in 90 minutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".