Proposal for creative tourism activities to diversify offerings at Grand Memories Holguín Hotel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The recreational offerings within the hotel are crucial for achieving customer satisfaction and setting the hotel from competitors. Therefore, it is essential to plan animation activities creatively and innovatively in order to diversify the tourist offerings and adapt them to the changing needs of the market. The objective of this article is to propose creative tourism activities to enhance the offerings at the Grand Memories Holguín hotel. The methodology used in the paper includes tools such as documentary review, direct observation, brainstorming, checklists and identification of strengths and weaknesses. The results highlight challenges in the hotel's animation process despite an overall positive image. Additionally, creative tourism activities have been suggested to diversify the hotel's offerings and cater to the needs of the main market segments: Canadian and Cuban-American clients. It is recommended to implement the proposal, conduct a feasibility analysis, allocate necessary resources, monitor activities and identify areas for improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it