ЯК ЗБЕРІГАЛИ МОВНУ Й ІСТОРИЧНУ ПАМ’ЯТЬ: RATIO ТА EMOTIO В ЛИСТУВАННІ МОВОЗНАВЦІВ-ЧЛЕНІВ НТШ ЗА РАДЯНСЬКОГО РЕЖИМУ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DOI https://doi.org/10.33402/zuz.2025-21-243-257 The significance of historical lexicography for the preservation of national identity, historical and linguistic memory, in particular the role of Ukrainian historical lexicography of the 20th century in this process is characterized. Ukrainian linguists worked under the total pressure of the Soviet repressive system. It is demonstrated by the example of activities of the greatest linguist-lexicographer of the first half of the 20th century – Professor Eugene Tymchenko (1866–1948), a full member of the SSS, editor of the unique «Historical dictionary of the Ukrainian language», as well as an outstanding grammarian, author of a number of unique works on the case system of the Ukrainian language. Professor Eugene Tymchenko was repressed, served his exile and returned to Kyiv a few years before his death. It is deduced how Eugene Tymchenko’s work was continued by Professor Oleksa Gorbach (1918–1997), a well-known linguist on the emigration, full member of the SSS, who was able to avoid the direct terror of the Soviet system and worked in Germany for a long time. At his own expense, he republished a number of the unique Ukrainian grammars published before 1930s, as well as valuable lexicographic works. Thus, in the last quarter of the 20th century, through the efforts of O. Gorbach, the «Historical dictionary of the Ukrainian language», edited by E. Tymchenko and published in 1930–1932 during the professor’s lifetime, returned to Ukrainian linguists, but was later banned, and the text with following letters was destroyed. The relationship between generations of Ukrainian linguists of the XX century is revealed on the basis of Oleksa Gorbach’s correspondence with a wide range of scientists-humanitarians outside Ukraine, mostly full members of the SSS, and with many scientists who lived in Soviet Ukraine and, despite the totalitarian system of government, developed Ukrainian science and preserved the traditions and memory of their predecessors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.162 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".