MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7155605241 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19758850

The Learning Commitment Handbook

2016· book· en· W7155605241 on OpenAlexaff
Tirzah Elese Bagnulo

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typebook
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperiential learningAgency (philosophy)Learning sciencesProfessional learning communityActive learning (machine learning)Formal learningAction learningCooperative learningCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Learning Commitment is a research-informed pedagogical handbook developed by Tirzah Elese Bagnulo and proven across 455 schools. Grounded in neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and 21st century learning theory, it presents a comprehensive framework — Making Learning Visible, Making Learning Relevant, and Making Learning Meaningful — for transforming teaching and learning environments to meet the needs of today's learners. Drawing on partnerships with the Royal Society Scotland and the Harvard Childhood Institute, the handbook sets out a philosophy and practical methodology for embedding deep learning, higher-order thinking, and student agency across all age groups and settings. It covers instructional design, learning environments, assessment, systemic school change, and the leadership required to sustain transformation. Written for teachers, school leaders, and education consultants, it argues that schools must evolve from compliance-driven, standardised models toward adaptive, neuroscience-informed learning ecosystems capable of preparing young people for a rapidly changing world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionFrench-language works237,207