Взаємодія українських націоналістичних організацій Канади з українським націоналістичним рухом на Батьківщині й у світі (1918–1939)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article briefly reports about the process of founding and development of the Ukrainian nationalist movement in the Diaspora in Canada in interwar period, which was presented by Ukrainian war veterans association and Ukrainian national federation, and characterizes directions of their activity. In this context it the emphasis has been made on the relief activities of these organizations to compatriots at home in the time of famine, repression, the rise of the national liberation struggle. It has been researched the connections of these organizations with other nationalist societies in the world. For example, Ukrainian nationalists of Canada were in contact with the Organization for the Rebirth of Ukraine from the USA, and in Europe – with the Ukrainian national association in Paris, Ukrainian military organization, and later – with the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and others. The results of such relations and cooperation for the Ukrainian nationalist movement in Canada and the Ukrainian nation have been analyzed.Keywords: Nationalist Movement, Public Organization, Ukrainian War Veterans Association, Ukrainian National Federation, Interaction of Ukrainians in the World.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".