MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7158007817 · doi:10.7202/1124606ar

Da Silva Amanda, Cécile Giraud, Josepha Milazzo et Kelly Poulet (dir.), 2023, L’expérience migratoire. De la parole aux dispositifs. Louvain-la-Neuve, Éditions Academia, coll. « Transitions sociales et résistances », 270 p.

2025· article· fr· W7158007817 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre Peraldi-Mittelette

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Exile Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)Selection (genetic algorithm)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Da Silva Amanda, Cécile Giraud, Josepha Milazzo et Kelly Poulet (dir.), 2023, L’expérience migratoire. De la parole aux dispositifs. Louvain-la-Neuve, Éditions Academia, coll. « Transitions sociales et résistances », 270 p.. Un article de la revue Anthropologie et Sociétés (Matérialités en exil : sensorialités et sensibilités) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicMigration and Exile StudiesFrench-language works237,207