MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7158253308 · doi:10.7202/1124612ar

Gajardo Anahy, 2024, Autochtonies en terrain miné. Formation et fragmentation des Diaguita dans le Chili néolibéralisé. Genève, Métis Presses, 320 p.

2025· article· fr· W7158253308 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Antoine G. A. Cailloce

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)Yield (engineering)Terrain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gajardo Anahy, 2024, Autochtonies en terrain miné. Formation et fragmentation des Diaguita dans le Chili néolibéralisé. Genève, Métis Presses, 320 p.. Un article de la revue Anthropologie et Sociétés (Matérialités en exil : sensorialités et sensibilités) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.431 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207