Relación entre el estilo de vida y la reserva cognitiva en población adulta mayor de Costa Rica
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following investigation analyzes the integration of the cognitive state, cognitive reserve, and lifestyle in a sample of thirty inhabitants of the Great Metropolitan Area (GAM), as well as thirty inhabitants from the Nicoya Peninsula (considered “Blue Zone”), representing both the urban and rural landscape of Costa Rica. The investigation employed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the CRC Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire, and the Healt-Pro-moting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) through a non-experimental descriptive methodology. Amongst the results it can be remarked that there were no statistically significant differences found between populations in cognitive reserve nor cognitive state. Nonetheless, regarding the lifestyle variable, results demonstrate a significant difference favoring Nicoya Peninsula. The main predominant variables in life style in the studied population were exercise as a biological variable, and the self-actualization as a psychological variable. Cognitive health has thus been concluded as an influential element in healthy aging processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it