Quantification of runoff components in the Yarlung Tsangpo River using a distributed hydrological model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robust calibration of physically based hydrological models is essential for the quantification of runoff components in snow and glacier melt runoff fed basins. This study evaluates a hydrograph partitioning curve (HPC) based calibration technique utilizing seasonality of precipitation and temperature in the Yarlung Tsangpo River basin. The HPC indicate the separating periods when various runoff components, including baseflow, snowmelt and glacier melt runoff, and rainfall direct runoff, dominate the basin hydrograph. Parameters of the THREW distributed hydrological model are grouped into four categories according to their controls on the runoff processes, and subsequently calibrated in a stepwise procedure using extracted HPC. The HPC-based calibration method is evaluated against traditional methods on the basis of robustness, performance of discharge simulations in sub-basins, and estimates of snow water equivalent (SWE) across the whole basin. Results show that:① The HPC-based calibration method provides results comparable to traditional methods in the calibration period while improving the discharge simulation for the evaluation period relative to single objective calibration methods; ② The HPC-based calibration method shows superiority in producing robust sub-basin discharge and tends to estimate smaller bias for the basin SWE; ③ The HPC-based calibration method estimates the contributions of snowmelt, glacier-melt, and rainfall direct runoff to discharge during 2001—2015 as 20%, 14% and 66%, respectively, while the traditional calibration methods yield a higher contribution for glacier-melt runoff and lower contribution for snowmelt runoff. Our findings indicate the potential of the HPC-based calibration method as a tool to quantify the contribution of runoff components, thus improving the modeling of hydrological behaviors under changing climate conditions for similar basins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".