TRANSGENERATIONAL EFFECTS OF HOST PLANT SWITCHING AND ASTER YELLOWS PHYTOPLASMA INFECTION ON THE FITNESS AND MICROBIOME OF THE ASTER LEAFHOPPER (Macrosteles quadrilineatus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vector–pathogen–plant interactions shape the risk and severity of Aster Yellows (AY) outbreaks in Prairie agroecosystems. This thesis tested how the aster leafhopper (ALH), Macrosteles quadrilineatus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) infection by the aster yellows phytoplasma, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ (AYp), and host plants use jointly influence vector fitness and microbiome composition under controlled conditions. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, AYp effects on reproduction, development, and bacterial communities were evaluated by confirming adult infection status using probe-based qPCR and confining pre-sexed AYp-infected or uninfected pairs to individual barley plants for seven days for mating and oviposition; nymphs were counted at 3-day intervals and development was summarized using a Growth Index (GI). Microbiomes of pooled adults were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analyzed in QIIME 2 to quantify alpha diversity, beta diversity, and genus-level composition. AYp infection increased fecundity, while GI did not differ between treatments, indicating a reproductive advantage without a detectable change in developmental rate. Microbiome profiles suggested broader treatment-level lineage representation in AYp-infected ALH, whereas AYp-uninfected ALH showed higher within-sample richness and evenness; however, beta diversity did not clearly separate infection treatments and communities remained dominated by the obligate nutritional symbionts ‘Candidatus Sulcia’ and ‘Candidatus Nasuia’. Infection effects were expressed mainly as shifts in relative abundance, with infected insects showing stronger dominance by obligate symbionts and AYp-uninfected ALHs carrying higher proportions of facultative associates including ‘Candidatus Berkiella’, Arsenophonus, and Cardinium. In the second experiment, host plants effect on fitness and microbiomes were tested across five generations using a transgenerational host-switching design in which three parental colonies (F0) were maintained on barley, wheat, and fleabane and fifth-instar nymphs from each colony were transferred into no-choice cup cages on either their natal host or a novel host (barley, wheat, fleabane, or dandelion). Nymphs were reared to adulthood, three male–female pairs per cage were allowed to oviposit for seven days, and offspring emergence was tracked every three days to the fifth instar (19–23 days) to estimate fecundity and calculate GI; this cycle was repeated through F₂–F₄ with host switching imposed at each fifth-instar transfer, and all lineages were returned to their natal host at F₅. Dandelion functioned as a dead-end host, with very low fecundity and GI in F₁ and no lineage persistence beyond that generation, whereas barley, wheat, and fleabane supported development across all generations, but reproductive output diverged progressively, with differences becoming more pronounced through F₃–F₄ and clearest by F₅. Microbiome trajectories paralleled these multigenerational fitness patterns, with alpha diversity increasing from early to late generations and beta diversity shifting most strongly across generations rather than in direct response to host species at a single time point; the magnitude and timing of these changes depended on colony of origin, switching lineage, generation, and their interactions. Early generations were relatively enriched in facultative associates such as ‘Candidatus Berkiella’ and Arsenophonus, whereas later generations showed increasing dominance of the obligate symbionts ‘Candidatus Sulcia’ and ‘Candidatus Nasuia’, indicating that long-term diet history and lineage background jointly shape symbiont restructuring. Overall, these findings show that AYp infection can enhance reproductive performance through subtle rebalancing within a conserved symbiont core and that multigenerational host plant history, more than host identity at a single time point, is a major driver of microbiome organization and long-term offspring fitness, providing mechanistic insight relevant to forecasting and managing AYp risk in Prairie agriculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".