Le corps des morts dans le conflit : une vie du droit en mutation pour une plus grande protection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore comment le droit international traite les restes humains dans les conflits armés, montrant que la protection juridique des corps est au coeur de l’affirmation de la dignité post mortem. Si le droit international humanitaire impose des obligations quant au traitement respectueux des dépouilles, il demeure souvent fragile en pratique. Le droit pénal international prolonge ce cadre en considérant les corps comme victimes de violations post mortem ou comme preuves de l’intention dans les crimes les plus graves. Le droit international des droits de l’homme reconnaît la souffrance des proches survivants et leurs droits, contribuant ainsi à façonner une forme de statut juridique posthume. À la croisée de ces régimes, le corps des morts devient plus qu’un cadavre : il incarne une mémoire, une identité et une portée juridique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".