Reporte de caso: enteropexia en intususcepción recurrente en golden retriever cachorro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intussusceptions are defined as the invagination of a segment into the lumen to the adjacent segment in a peristaltic direction or occasionally in a retrograde direction. The main clinical signs are vomiting, anorexia, lethargy and abdominal pain. These may be associated with infectious and non-infectious causes; and its highest incidence occurs in breeds such as Labrador, Mestizo, German Shepherd, Golden Retriever and German Shorthaired Pointer, especially in individuals under one year of age. The diagnosis of the disease can be made through a general clinical examination, based on clinical signs and abdominal palpation; although abdominal ultrasonography is especially indicated. Treatment is surgical and consists of manual reduction or bowel resection and anastomosis depending on the severity of the condition. Although recurrence is not common, there are reports and the indicated treatment is enteropexy or enteroplication. This report evidences the surgical management given to a recurrent intussusception in a Golden Retriever puppy. The patient presented parasitosis due to oocysts of Cystoisospora spp, which triggered an intussusception at the level of the jejunum that was resolved by manual reduction and 12 hours later it presented again in another portion of the jejunum, for which an enteropexy was performed, allowing the intussusception to be resolved and preventing recurrence again. The objective of this case report is to describe the surgical techniques used to resolve recurrent intussusceptions and the possibility of prophylactic use of enteropexy or enteroplication as a preventive measure for their recurrence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".