HANTÉE PAR LE CANADA FRANÇAIS : LA LITTÉRATURE QUÉBÉCOISE RÉCENTE ET SES FANTÔMES1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis quelques années, le nombre d’oeuvres québécoises qui portent sur l’ancien Canada français ou l’actuelle francophonie canadienne ne cesse de croître, tant et si bien que certains spécialistes désignent cette préoccupation de la littérature québécoise récente par la métaphore de la hantise. Et si cette littérature était hantée au sens figuré comme au sens propre, dans le sens d’être habitée par des fantômes ? En recourant à l’ hantologie (Jacques Derrida, Mark Fischer) comme cadre théorique, cet article propose de traquer la figure du fantôme (et ses variations plus ou moins surnaturelles) ainsi que la présence-absence de la francophonie canadienne dans six textes narratifs : la nouvelle « Antigonish » parue dans Arvida (2011) de Samuel Archibald, ainsi que les romans Les trois lieues (2008) de Sylvie Desrosiers, Camille (2015) de Patrick Isabelle, Cadillac (2018) de Biz, L’homme de la Saskatchewan (2011) de Jacques Poulin et Va me chercher Baby Doll (2021) de Lucie Lachapelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".