Вплив застосування пінки для відновлення шкіри "SUN-EKT®" на процеси регенерації шкіри після косметологічних процедур та видалення новоутворень
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Цитуйте українською у Ванкувер стилі: Савоськіна ВО, Орленко ОМ. Вплив застосування пінки для відновлення шкіри "SUN-EKT®" на процесирегенерації шкіри після косметологічних процедур та видалення новоутворень. Медицина сьогодні і завтра. 2023;92(3):62-9. https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2023.92.3.sor Архівовано: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14923412 Резюме Дослідження було проведене з метою вивчення ефективності застосування пінки для відновлення шкіри "SUN-EKT®" у косметологічній практиці після видалення новоутворень, впливу хімічного пілінгу або подразнюючої дії косметологічних та апаратних процедур. Було обстежено 107 пацієнтів після видалення новоутворень та/або подразнюючих процедур, яких розділили на 3 групи: до І увійшло 38 пацієнтів, які використовували для відновлення шкіри "SUN-EKT®", до ІІ – 33 пацієнти, що використовували «Пантенол», до ІІІ – 36 пацієнтів, які використовували інші регенеруючі засоби або очікували самостійного загоєння пошкоджень. Були вивчені по порівняні показники гідратації рогового шару шкіри, 11-тибальна шкала відчуття болю, застосована дерматоскопія та шкірний аналізатор. За всіма показниками (тому числі за швидкістю зниження інтенсивності болю) процес загоєння проходив найкраще у І групі, що дозволяє рекомендувати "SUN-EKT®" для широкого використання. Ключові слова: рана, опіки, лазерна епіляція, загоєння, ін’єкційна та апаратна косметологія. Cite in English in Vancouver style: Savoskina V, Orlenko O. Effect of the use of foam for skin regeneration "SUN-EKT®" on the processes of skin regeneration after cosmetic procedures and removal of tumors. Medicine Today and Tomorrow. 2023;92(3):62-9. https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2023.92.3.sor [in Ukrainian]. Archived: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14923412 Abstract The study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of foam for skin regeneration "SUN-EKT®" in cosmetology practice after removal of neoplasms, exposure to chemical peeling or the irritating effect of cosmetology and hardware procedures. 107 patients were examined after the removal of neoplasms and/or irritating procedures, who were divided into 3 groups: І included 38 patients who used "SUN-EKT®" for skin regeneration, ІІ – 33 patients who used "Panthenol", ІІІ – 36 patients who used other regenerative means or expected self-healing of injuries. The indicators of hydration of the stratum corneum, the 10-point scale of pain sensation (Numerical Rating Scale), applied dermatoscopy and skin analyzer were studied in comparison. In the І group, the intensity of pain was 5.9 points on the 1st day from the start of using "SUN-EKT®", 4.3 – on the 3rd day, 2.8 – on the 7th day. For comparison, in the II group this indicator was 6.8, 6.1 and 3.7; and in the III group – 7.7, 7.1 and 5.9 points in the corresponding terms. The average value of the "hydration of the stratum corneum" indicator in the I group on the 1st day from the start of using "SUN-EKT®" was 23.2; after 3 days – 27.6; after 7 days – 32.1, i.e. increased by 38.4% over 7 days. For comparison, in II and III groups it was 21.1; 22.3; and 27.1, as well as 18.4; 19.6; and 22.7 in the corresponding periods, and increased by 28.4% and 23.4%, respectively. Non-invasive skin monitoring revealed a gradual decrease in manifestations of hyperemia, edema, and hypervascularity within 7 days in all three groups, but the rate of recovery was the fastest in group I and the slowest in group III. It was concluded that according to all indicators, the healing process was the best in the I group, which allows us to recommend "SUN-EKT®" for wide use. Keywords: wounds, burns, laser epilation, healing, injection and hardware cosmetology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.161 | 0.079 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".