MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160109628 · doi:10.70082/7vzqk725

Evaluating The Relationship Between Thyroid Dysfunction And Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review

2025· article· W7160109628 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Atef Eid Madkour Elsayed

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of Diabetic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationSubclinical infectionThyroid functionThyroidThyroid diseaseAtrial fibrillationThyroid dysfunctionThyroid function tests

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Thyroid hormones play a critical role in regulating cardiovascular physiology. Dysregulation, whether overt or subclinical, has been linked to arrhythmias, heart failure, atherosclerosis, and metabolic disturbances. Understanding these associations is crucial for early risk stratification and clinical intervention. Objective: To systematically review observational and Mendelian randomization studies examining the relationship between thyroid dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2025. Studies assessing serum thyroid hormones (TSH, FT3, FT4), subclinical or overt thyroid disease, or genetically predicted thyroid function and cardiovascular outcomes were included. Both cross-sectional, cohort, and Mendelian randomization designs were considered. Data extraction focused on sample characteristics, thyroid measures, cardiovascular outcomes, and effect estimates. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and MR-specific criteria. Results: Ten studies were included, encompassing >1.5 million participants across global cohorts. Low thyroid function correlated with adverse cardiovascular health metrics and metabolic risk factors (Fang et al., 2024; Bai et al., 2025; Neves et al., 2022). Hyperthyroid tendencies, indicated by low TSH or high FT4, were causally linked to atrial fibrillation (Larsson et al., 2019; Ellervik et al., 2019). MR analyses showed protective effects of mild hypothyroidism against stroke (Marouli et al., 2020) but no consistent relationship with ischemic heart disease (Zhao & Schooling, 2017). Hormone replacement therapy required careful titration to avoid over- or under-replacement, impacting cardiovascular outcomes (Evron et al., 2022; Stamatouli et al., 2020). Conclusions: Thyroid dysfunction, including subclinical states, has significant implications for cardiovascular health. Both metabolic and arrhythmic pathways mediate this risk, emphasizing the need for early detection, individualized monitoring, and multidisciplinary management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of Diabetic StudiesSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207