Clown, Care, and Community: A Conversation
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Conversation piece in a theatre review on clowning, care, and community; the object is performance practice.
The title indicates a conversation about clown care and community rather than research itself.
Conversation piece in a theatre journal with no abstract; no evidence the object is research itself.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Canadian Theatre Review
- Topic
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- —
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no