Les plateformes numériques consacrées aux archives des arts vivants : geste mémoriel ou outil de légitimation ? Le cas de Somim
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une étude du cas Somim, plateforme numérique consacrée au Festival Mimos (Périgueux, France). Ce point d’ancrage invite à une réflexion plus globale sur les enjeux de mémoire, de médiation et de légitimation culturelles inhérents à ces objets virtuels. Inscrites dans les politiques publiques françaises de numérisation depuis les années 1990, les plateformes numériques vouées aux arts vivants mettent en tension des questions de conservation, d’usage et de médiation des archives audiovisuelles. En observant le cas de Somim et en jetant un regard sur cinq plateformes similaires, l’article montre que ces dispositifs numériques participent à la construction d’une mémoire collective tout en révélant les fragilités économiques, techniques et symboliques des processus contemporains de patrimonialisation des arts du mime français en particulier, et du spectacle vivant en général.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".