La déconstruction du stéréotype dans les contes de fées de la dramaturge sicilienne Emma Dante
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse la manière dont Emma Dante déconstruit les stéréotypes liés au féminin et au genre dans deux de ses adaptations théâtrales contemporaines de contes de fées. L’étude des pièces La bella Rosaspina addormentata (2013) et Anastasia, Genoveffa e Cenerentola (2010) met en lumière la manière dont Dante remplace les modèles patriarcaux par des personnages hybrides et subversifs. Le théâtre devient un espace de « quotidianisation » (« quotidianizzazione »; Barsotti, 2016) du merveilleux d’où émergent les archétypes jungiens de l’Amante et de la Femme sauvage. Le travestissement, la non-binarité et la critique sociale y occupent une place centrale, faisant du théâtre dantien un outil politique et inclusif qui interroge la binarité et valorise la liberté des corps et des identités.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".