MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160367545

Wowprime: A Strategic Dilemma in Diversification on the Chinese Mainland

2024· other· W7160367545 on OpenAlexaff
Soo-Hung Terence 蔡舒恒, 朱琼, 张云路

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2024
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilemmaDiversification (marketing strategy)Mainland ChinaMainlandChinaSecurity dilemma
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例主要描写了王品在中国大陆市场20年的战略发展历程,同时呈现了王品在中国台湾地区的创业发展背景。王品进驻大陆地区市场前十年(2003-2012年),主要依靠从中国台湾总部引进的品牌发展,存活下来的是王品牛排和西堤牛排。2012年起,王品选择了品牌多元化战略,并制定了目标,要在2022年拥有,1000家店。此后,它陆续进入了日料、粤菜、川菜、中式快餐和火锅等领域。然而,在与大陆餐饮同行鏖战十年后,它在大陆只拥有121家店,业绩不如预期。因此,2022年12月底,王品集团董事兼大陆市场中心总经理英美惠跟她的同事们不得不坐下来商议:在中国大陆市场,王品要想发展成为餐饮行业的头部品牌,接下来该如何行动?是继续兼顾中西餐市场?还是回归并聚焦自己所擅长的西餐市场?是否需要投入资源开发西餐下沉市场?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207