Towards a People-Centred Approach in Archaeological Heritage Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the heritage sector, engaging communities in the heritage process has become one of the most dominant issues to address in the twenty-first century. This is felt worldwide and across all heritage domains. It is an attempt to answer the need to improve living conditions and protect the planet’s environment. It is in this context that the editors of this volume aim to address the challenge of connecting archaeology and archaeological heritage management with a people-centred approach, one that intertwines with a sustainable development agenda. The papers in this special issue illustrate multiple perspectives on the theme and various ways of working towards this goal. Some consist of critical (conceptual) reflections on the efforts of responsible heritage organisations and the impacts (or lack thereof) of heritage policies. Others provide case studies of good practice and stories of successful approaches, including those relating to UNESCO World Heritage sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it