MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160378461 · doi:10.2196/87692

Effect of a personalized mobile application on glucose control in adults with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: an exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

2025· article· en· W7160378461 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elena Lalama, Marta Csanalosi, Stefan Kabisch, Dr Saskia Wilson-Barnes, Lazaros Gymnopoulos, Kosmas Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos Rouskas, Argiriou Anagnostis, Ioannis Oikonomidis, Leontios Hadjileontiadis, Veronique Cornelissen, Maria Hassapidou, Ioannis Pagkalos, Sofia Balula Dias, Kathryn Hart, Andreas H. Pfeiffer

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Human Factors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrediabetesRandomized controlled trialType 2 diabetesPilot trialControl (management)Glycemic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to increase, and the lack of individualized therapy strategies hinders patient engagement with and commitment to a healthy lifestyle. The PROTEIN project aimed to facilitate users in choosing healthy living, thereby improving their metabolism and T2D management. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy of a personalized mobile app to achieve a 5% time in range (TIR) improvement over a 12-week intervention in adults with prediabetes or T2D. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory pilot randomized controlled trial with 21 individuals with T2D or prediabetes who used a continuous glucose monitoring system and the PROTEIN mobile app for personalized meals and exercise recommendations based on their glucose levels and physical activity. RESULTS: The TIR of the participants increased (P<.05; from 71.8%, SD 27.3% to 76%, SD 28.1%) with individual use of the PROTEIN app but did not achieve a 5% improvement overall; however, given the exploratory design and small sample size, this finding should be interpreted with caution. Glycated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, and body weight did not fluctuate throughout the 12-week intervention. The dropout rate was high, and the average duration of use of the PROTEIN app was 42 (range 5-84) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a modest increase in TIR with the use of the PROTEIN app; however, considering the exploratory design and small sample size, this finding should be interpreted as preliminary. Integrating wearables and automated personalization for well-being is an innovative approach that must keep pace with the accelerated development of ever-evolving technologies. The COVID-19 pandemic was a major obstacle to recruitment in our clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05951140; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05951140.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Human FactorsSame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207