MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160461937

Entrevista a Germán Labrador (Exhumar una fosa)

2012· article· es· W7160461937 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Germán Labrador

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPeriod (music)Social life
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente material interactivo, fruto de la colaboración de profesores del Departamento de Antropología Social y Cultural de la UNED y de investigadores del proyecto del CSIC "Balance de una década de exhumaciones en España", pretende explicar a los estudiantes y al público en general cómo se investiga científicamente una fosa común de la Guerra Civil en la España contemporánea y presentar el trabajo de cada uno de estos investigadores que colaboran de manera interdisciplinaria en las tareas vinculadas con la recuperación y análisis de restos humanos de fosas comunes. Se recoge también el punto de vista de otros actores sociales sobre el proceso

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Same topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207