La résilience : résister pour se construire , Sous la direction de M. Manciaux, Genève, Éditions Médecine et Hygiène, 2001 : 253 p., ISBN : 2-88049-161-4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RésuméL’étude porte sur la validation préliminaire d’une affiche éducative sur l’hygiène buccale destinée à des personnes d’au moins 65 ans vivant en établissement ou bénéficiaires de soins à domicile. L’affiche vise à modifier certains comportements à risque. Vingt-quatre personnes issues de milieu modeste, recrutées dans un centre de jour pour aînés de la région de Montréal (Québec, Canada) y ont participé. Cette étude a été réalisée en trois étapes : la conceptualisation de l’affiche et deux prétests. Pour la collecte de données pertinentes, des entrevues et la méthode de « focus group » ont été utilisées. Les deux pré-tests ont indiqué que l’affiche est facile à lire, attrayante et favorise le développement de nouvelles compétences chez les personnes âgées et la mise en pratique des messages transmis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".