Bioactives and Therapeutic Potential of Red Root Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and Berlandier's Amaranth (Amaranthus polygonoides L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amaranthus retroflexus L. is an annual herb and one of the most common weedy amaranth that is native to tropical America. It primarily grows in the riverbank of Eastern and Central USA, South-Eastern Canada, and Mexico ( Sauer, 1967 ). A recent study reveals that the plant has a wide distribution in Asia, Europe, South America, and Africa ( Pacifico et al., 2008 ). The plant is commonly called “Rough Pigweed” or “Redroot Pigweed” Amaranth. The amaranth has an erect stem of about 2 m with fine hairs, and it is freely branched. The leaves are rhombic-ovate and green in color with a long thin petiole and wavy or undulating margin ( CABI, 2021 ). The inflorescence is greenish or crimson and clustered terminally; the flower is densely crowded and has green spiny bracts. The flowering occurs from July-September. The fruit is a utricle or a membranous bladder with a tiny black or dark brown oval seed. The root system contains pink or red short stout taproots ( Walsh, 1993 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".