MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160584098

Att legitimera ett normativt avsteg? : En innehållsanalys av Finlands argumentering för utträdet ur Ottawafördraget

2025· article· sv· W7160584098 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ebba Ek

Bibliographic record

VenueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagesv
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Security and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecuritizationReinterpretationHuman rightsTreatyNormativeHumanitarian crisisGovernment (linguistics)MilitarismHumanitarian aidInternational relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines to what extent securitization and humanitarian identity-maintaining discourses are represented in the Finnish governments and parliament’s arguments for the country’s withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty in 2025. The study's method consists of a qualitative content analysis of the Finnish government's proposal and the Defence Committee's statement. Through the study's theoretical framework of securitization and human rights as socially constructed, the analysis identifies recurring patterns for how the withdrawal is discursively motivated. The results of this study indicate that the argumentation has been largely characterized by the securitization discourse where the security environment is presented as altered in relation to Russia's aggression and the war in Ukraine, which is portrayed as exceptional and existential. The threat image presented interacts with arguments about commitments that normal commitments and procedures are considered insufficient, which legitimizes extraordinary measures in the form of withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty. In parallel with the securitization arguments, the analysis shows that humanitarian norms persist where the humanitarian identity is maintained through a strategic reinterpretation of Finland's humanitarian self-image. The Government and the Defence Committee present the withdrawal from the Ottawa Treaty as consistent with Finland's humanitarian values, where the emphasis on continued humanitarian commitment to international law and arms control suggests fulfilling the country's humanitarian goals but by other means. In summary, this study contributes to the research field of norms and small states in international relations, where the study presents one way of how states can legitimize normative deviation through the use of both securitization and reinterpretation of their humanitarian identity. The study's findings highlight the way language can be used and play a central role in states' argumentation and management of potential normative costs in times where security requirements compete with a recognized international humanitarian norm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)Same topicGlobal Security and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207