Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Driving Technological Innovation and Sustainable Finance in the UAE Financial Services Sector: An AI Integrated Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extensive application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping every industry in the UAE economy. Considering its vision of becoming a global leader in AI and a global financial hub, extraordinary opportunities and notable challenges are provided. This paper investigates the challenges AI technology brings to the financial industry concerning financial stability and sustainability. Through literature review and analysis and the quantitative analysis on the UAE AI application in the financial sector, it is proved that by using large data sets and high-dimensional data sets created in the financial sector, AI technology helps to utilize the information to enhance financial efficiency, lower costs, mitigate risks, and improve financial inclusion. However, applying AI in financial services may lead to discrimination, privacy breaches, digital manipulation, and financial exclusion when a robust framework is lacking, thus increasing financial instability and risks such as cybersecurity and IT risks. These potential challenges cannot be ignored when deploying AI technology, as they may manifest themselves in various forms, such as biases, inequity, or other ethical concerns, which may impede economic growth and threaten overall sustainability. An integrated framework is developed based on the analysis, in the hope of helping UAE financial industry decision-makers and specialists make informed decisions in the face of the challenges AI technology brings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".