MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7160673854

Application of asphaltenes molecular structure analysis in assessing lateral reservoir continuity: A case study in the Bangestan reservoir from a field of Dezful Embayment

2025· article· fa· W7160673854 on OpenAlexaff
Morteza Asemani, Marjan Saeidi, Arezou Rezaei

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneOil fieldFlow (mathematics)Field (mathematics)HydrocarbonResidual oilPetroleum
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reservoir compartmentalization is a phenomenon whereby the presence of flow barriers divides a hydrocarbon reservoir into separate zones with distinct flow behaviors. Accurate identification of these flow barriers and the various reservoir zones is crucial for optimal field management, accurate reserve estimation, proper well placement design, and, in general, for all future field development decisions. Given the significance of studying reservoir compartmentalization in Iranian oil fields, this paper investigates lateral continuity in the Bangestan reservoir in one of the fields from the Dezful Embayment. For this purpose, a novel and efficient approach was employed, utilizing the structural characteristics of asphaltenes through Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Asphaltenes are macromolecular compounds with a structure similar to kerogen. Due to their stability against secondary processes, such as biodegradation and water washing, they serve as reliable indicators for obtaining oil fingerprints and assessing fluid composition heterogeneity within a reservoir. In this study, four crude oil samples were collected from producing wells in the Bangestan reservoir and analyzed by FTIR to determine various structural indices, including aliphatic, aromatic, branched, and substitution indices, to compare the structural characteristics of different asphaltenes. The results showed that sample S-1 exhibited significant differences in structural indices and chemical composition compared to the other samples (S-2, S-3, and S-4). This issue indicates a difference in crude oil fingerprints among the studied wells, which is attributed to the presence of a flow barrier in the Bangestan reservoir. To confirm these results, pressure data were also analyzed, which revealed a different pressure gradient for well S-1 compared to the other wells, further supporting the presence of a flow barrier. Therefore, the use of structural characteristics of asphaltenes is considered an efficient, low-cost, and straightforward method, providing results comparable to reservoir engineering data in identifying reservoir discontinuities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→