Concert performance of Mykola Fomenko’s works and their scientific publicistic evaluation (to the 130th anniversary of the composer’s birthday)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the attention paid to the creative life of the Ukrainian composer Mykola Fomenko (1894–1961) during his second emigration period in the USA. Main objective of the study and its scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive coverage of the concert performance of Mykola Fomenko’s works and their scientific and journalistic evaluation. Methodology. The following research methods were used in the article: historical-chronological method — to consider the issues of the life and work of composer M. Fomenko, covering the time period of the second half of the 20th century and the spatial dimension (Ukraine, diaspora in the world); axiological — to determine the value of the creative achievements of Ukrainian composers, poets and performers; culturological — to present the contribution of figures of musical culture to the Ukrainian treasury. Results / findings and conclusions. The concert performance of M. Fomenko’s works and their scientific and journalistic evaluation are highlighted. For this purpose, the musicological and journalistic literature of authors from Ukraine (G. Karas, G. Prykhodko, M. Chornobai) and the diaspora (V. Vytvytskyi, P. Volyniak, D. Gordynska-Karanovych, L. Zhuk, P. Matsenko, G. Lagodynska-Zaleska, V. Revutskyi, R. Savytskyi. A. Rudnytskyi) was analyzed, which provides a general description of the composer’s work and the performance features of a particular work. It is proven that M. Fomenko’s compositional heritage was relevant in the second half of the 20th century and was performed by famous performers and groups of the Ukrainian diaspora in the USA, Canada, and Austria. It has been established that the composer’s works were in the repertoire of diaspora singers Yosyp Goshulyak, Ivan Zadorozhnyi, Lubomyr Matsyuk, Mykhailo Minskyi, Izabela OrlovskaFomenko, Lev Reynarovych, Eva Stolyarchuk-Bims, pianists Oksana Bryzhun-Sokolyk, Daria Gordynska-Karanowych, Lyuba Zhuk, Vadym Kipa, Roman Savytsky, violinists Volodymyr Tsisyk, Oksana Simowych, cellist Khrystia Kolessa, T. Shevchenko Bandurist Chapel from Detroit, choir of St. Barbara’s Church in Vienna under the direction of A. Hnatyshyn, Detroit Ukrainian Millennium Choir, Warren Symphony Orchestra. Recordings of individual works by the composer have been discovered. It has been proven that M. Fomenko’s piano collection “My Rainbow” is used in the modern pedagogical process in Ukraine. The article is dedicated to the 130th anniversary of the composer’s birth. The prospects for further scientific research on the topic of the article lie in the musicological understanding of the problems of performing M. Fomenko’s works, their actualization in concert performance and the pedagogical process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".