MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160848646 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00117_1

The Gallery

2025· article· en· W7160848646 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah Munro

Bibliographic record

VenueBook 2 0 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt, Politics, and Modernism
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleResentmentSculptureDowntownArt galleryPainting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Set in a contemporary art gallery in downtown Toronto, this one-act play follows Hannah and Madigan, two childhood friends who reunite after years apart. Tensions escalate when it is revealed that Madigan is passing off Hannah’s sculpture as her own. Madigan, in turn, justifies it as a necessary evil. Accusations fly and old resentments surface as the two women battle over authorship, ownership, integrity and betrayal. Who gets to be recognized as an artist, and who is erased? With the gallery opening imminently and the truth soon to unravel, The Gallery explores the blurred lines between inspiration and theft, the weight of ambition and the consequences of rewriting history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1410.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook 2 0Same topicArt, Politics, and ModernismFrench-language works237,207