MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160909866 · doi:10.1121/10.0040279

Wearable ultrasound for continuous lung monitoring and pneumothorax detection

2025· article· en· W7160909866 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuu Ono, Khoa Tran, Shane Steinberg, Sreeraman Rajan, Shohei Mori, Robert Arntfield

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPneumothoraxContinuous monitoringUltrasonic sensorUltrasoundWearable computerBreathingTransducerModality (human–computer interaction)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pneumothorax (PTX) is an acute respiratory condition in which air accumulates between the lung and chest wall. PTX can become life threatening if not identified and treated; therefore, early detection and prompt intervention are critical for patients at risk. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a real-time, portable imaging modality suitable for bedside use. In contrast to chest X-ray for PTX detection, LUS does not use ionizing radiation and has demonstrated superior diagnostic performance. However, the operator dependence of handheld ultrasound probes limits the feasibility of continuous PTX monitoring which would enable early detection of PTX and be particularly beneficial for patients at ongoing risk, such as those under mechanical ventilation or aeromedical transport. We have developed a flexible, lightweight, and thin wearable ultrasonic sensor (WUS) for motion mode (M-mode) ultrasound image acquisitions. The WUS consists of a single-element ultrasonic transducer made of a polyvinylidene difluoride piezoelectric polymer film. Its simple fabrication and component materials make it low-cost and suitable for disposable use. The WUS is well-suited for long-term, continuous monitoring due to its hands-free operation. In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of the WUS for PTX detection by using M-mode image features with lung tissue-mimicking phantoms and in-vivo human subjects. [Work supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207