Fig. 29. Capitulum mitella cyprids with carapace removed. A in The Complete Larval Development of the Pedunculated Barnacle Capitulum mitella (Crustacea: Cirripedia) Using a Standardized Terminology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fig. 29. Capitulum mitella cyprids with carapace removed. A: Overview of thorax (th) and left side thoracopods 1–6 (anterior thoracopod damaged). Posteriorly the small abdomen and telson with caudal appendages. B: Detail of A showing posterior thoracopods, abdomen and telson. Note the distinct flexure between exopod segments 1 and 2, as likely happens during the recovery stroke. Numerous sclerites at the base of the limbs. C: Oblique close up of thoracopods showing natatory setae sited apically on endopod and exopod segments 2. Arrow points to short and stout seta apically on exopod segment 1. D: Ventral view showing the deeply cleaved telson (long arrow) and the narrow bridge (short arrow) between the two telson lobes. One-segmented caudal appendages attached to telson lobes. E: Oblique view of posteriormost end of the cyprid showing coxa (cx) and basis (ba) of thoracopods. Multiple sclerites at base of limbs (asterisks). Arrows point to two short setae situated dorsally on telson. F: Closeup dorsal view of abdomen, telson and caudal appendages. Legends: ab, abdomen; ba, basis; cap, caudal appendage; cx, coxa; en, endopod; enns, endopod natatory setae; ex, exopod; exns, exopod natatory setae; te, telson; th, thorax; tp, thoracopod; tpns, thoracopod natatory setae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".