MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160949867 · doi:10.1121/10.0041059

The rise of super-resolution ultrasound imaging: Past, present, and future innovations utilizing high-frequency ultrasound

2025· article· en· W7160949867 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Burris, Andrew Needles

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsFujiFilm VisualSonics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobubblesPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineUltrasoundTranslational researchFocused ultrasoundProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advancements in high-frequency ultrasound have transformed diagnostic imaging, enabling precise, non-invasive characterization of tissue and disease phenotypes. VisualSonics' innovative product portfolio has been instrumental in helping researchers advance the field of super-resolution imaging. From early breakthroughs with the Vevo 2100 mapping individual microbubbles in circulation, to generating super-resolution volumetric datasets with the Vevo 3100, and producing angled plane waves using VADA on the Vevo F2, researchers have consistently pushed the limits of these imaging systems to achieve unprecedented precision in microvascular resolution. Complementary multi-modal imaging with Vevo LAZR photoacoustic systems further enhances research by real-time, high-resolution molecular and functional data, expanding applications in translational and preclinical settings. Despite these advancements, challenges such as long acquisition times, labor-intensive postprocessing, motion sensitivity, and contrast dependence persist. Emerging technologies, including increased channel boards for ultrafast imaging, aim to address these limitations by improving temporal resolution, accelerating data collection, and widening imaging capabilities. Super-resolution imaging, with its ability to visualize subtle tissue variations and detailed microvasculature, continues to hold immense clinical and commercial potential, driving new frontiers in diagnostic and therapeutic applications while addressing critical hurdles in biomedical imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207