Introduction: Politicized (Re)Productions of Gender and Our Debt to John Money
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[First paragraph] When the pioneering psychologist John Money died in Baltimore in 2006, accounts in the popular press were surprisingly scarce and low‐key. Major newspapers in New Zealand (where Money was born), Australia, and Canada provided similar 300‐word to 500‐word obituary‐type stories (see “Sexologist,” “Kiwi Sexologist,” “Sex Researcher Coined”). An item in the ironically‐named “First with the News” edition of the Courier Mail in Australia ran on July 27th, some three weeks after his death and more than two weeks after reports elsewhere (“Sex Researcher Helped” 83). In the Washington Post, notice of Money’s death was placed ignominiously below the headline obit for the founder of a mattress factory (“Luis Barragan” C‐7). Few outside the world of scholarly work in sex, gender, and sexuality were aware a seminal and controversial figure had exited the stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".